Newsletter - Links - Advertise - Contact Us - Privacy
 

Questions raised over GSoA's Mackintosh Building stewardship

Bookmark and Share | Send to friend

September 20 2018

Questions raised over GSoA's Mackintosh Building stewardship

The Glasgow School of Art is facing some tough questions at a meeting of the Scottish Parliament’s Culture, Tourism, Europe and External Affairs committee amidst a public inquiry into its stewardship of the Mackintosh Building.

Today’s evidence session will consider written submissions prepared in advance by architect Malcolm Fraser, who has voiced alarm at the apparent use of PIR insulation as a ‘cost cut’. He wrote: “Its use in the refurbishment is regrettable: in my view it should not be allowed near historic buildings, or homes… or any building, really.

“The GSA is the most painful of a number of recent fires in prominent historic buildings, often during building work. While Kier, the contractor, has noted comprehensive fire measures it seems likely that the investigation will find comprehensive fault in their composition and execution.”

To prevent a recurrence in future Fraser recommends introduction of a mandatory fire risk assessment for historic buildings ahead of any construction work.

Mackintosh scholar Roger Billcliffe meanwhile questioned the official background given to the 2014 fire, writing: “A student was allowed to use banned materials within an exhibit which started a fire in a basement studio. At the time the director explained this as an unfortunate accident. Since 2014, however, it has been alleged that some staff tried to stop the student’s use of these materials, but they were over-ruled by senior staff to whom the student appealed claiming a restriction/denial of ‘artistic freedom’.

“Such actions by the School and its staff would be incompatible not only with simple health and safety concerns but are at the root of the different ethos of museums and art schools.”

Other submissions will be heard from local resident Ewan Kennedy, interior designer Anthony Sully and Stuart Robertson, director of the Charles Rennie Mackintosh Society.

Muriel Gray, chairwoman of the GSA board, has already declared that the building will be rebuilt as a working art school irrespective of the costs and timescales involved.

6 Comments

FHM
#1 Posted by FHM on 20 Sep 2018 at 12:23 PM
"Today’s evidence session will consider written submissions prepared in advance by architect Malcolm Fraser, who has voiced alarm at the apparent use of PIR insulation as a ‘cost cut’. He wrote: “Its use in the refurbishment is regrettable: in my view it should not be allowed near historic buildings, or homes… or any building, really."

Perhaps Mr Fraser should assess the output of HFM prior to making these silly statements?
Walt Disney
#2 Posted by Walt Disney on 20 Sep 2018 at 13:04 PM
MF obviously waiting for the findings of the investigation before he writes accusatory comments....oh...wait...
Obliged to Say
#3 Posted by Obliged to Say on 20 Sep 2018 at 15:31 PM
MF surely speaks as the next RIAS President in waiting, oh wait he is not on the ballot....or is he????
Tonald Drump
#4 Posted by Tonald Drump on 20 Sep 2018 at 23:32 PM
I think a cursory glance at fire statistics you will see the majority are the result of human error....

Senior staff at GSA should know better, but perhaps the many years of being so insulated has dulled their sense of reality.

Quick tip : to help pay for the costs of refurb (personally i'd turn the place into a hospital or a proper library) - just void the pensions and benefits of the staff involved - those future pension contributions could be offset against the buildings rebuild.

It won't cover the cost but it will also serve as a warning that this sort of fuzzy thinking doesn't come without consequences.
Philip
#5 Posted by Philip on 21 Sep 2018 at 07:54 AM
I am missing something, clearly... why is MF giving a written statement? Can anybody do this? Who does MF represent? Is he an expert witness?
Nairn's Bairn
#6 Posted by Nairn's Bairn on 21 Sep 2018 at 09:18 AM
"While Kier, the contractor, has noted comprehensive fire measures it seems likely that the investigation will find comprehensive fault in their composition and execution."

That's a very bold statement from Mr Fraser regarding Kier's culpability, effectively ruling out any fire source that a contractor might not have reasonably expected.

Mr F is presumably party to some early investigation findings - the rest of us will just have to wait until it is concluded and published.

Post your comments

 

All comments are pre-moderated and
must obey our house rules.

 

Back to September 2018

Search News
Subscribe to Urban Realm Magazine
Features & Reports
For more information from the industry visit our Features & Reports section.