Newsletter - Links - Advertise - Contact Us - Privacy

Architects break cover with RIAS transparency, pay and accountability demands

November 10 2017

Architects break cover with RIAS transparency, pay and accountability demands
Over 150 architects are pressing for change in the profession by going public with their demands for greater transparency and accountability from the Royal Incorporation of Architects in Scotland (RIAS) having formed a new movement.

A New Chapter is a group of disaffected RIAS members and architects concerned at a perceived ‘lack of effectiveness, poor governance and insufficient financial accountability’ shown by the professional body amidst criticism that repeated questions have gone unanswered.

These centre on a RIAS invitation for external consultants to conduct enquiries into staff salaries, governance and ‘probity’ - the findings of which remain confidential, prompting some members to question the ‘increasingly secretive and autocratic’ leadership of the body.

In an open letter addressed to RIAS president Stewart Henderson the group wrote: “We are not daft. Why would anyone instruct expensive consultants to carry out a Probity Review if there had not been grounds for concern? If the RIAS had been given a clean bill of health as the president implied in the current edition of the RIAS Quarterly, why the big secret? Following a year when the RIAS appears to have had a significant over-spend, and had to pass a cap around asking practices to make significant one-off donations, are we to think that a review of staff pay and benefits is just a coincidence?

“There is now growing concern that these reviews have uncovered serious failures of governance and serious financial mismanagement; and that, faced with this, the small, self-perpetuating, male fiefdom that controls the organisation, appears to be acting to protect itself from the results of its failings.”

In response the group are demanding sight of all three reviews together with a full breakdown of senior employee pay and the methodologies used to set remuneration rates.

A New Chapter Members and Fellows:
Malcolm Fraser
Jude Barber
Robin Livingstone
Ewan Anderson
Chris Stewart
Mary Arnold Foster
Will Tunnell
Gerry Hogan
Akiko Kobayashi
Matt Bridgestock
Peter Johnson
Robin Webster
Kieran Gaffney
Calum Duncan
Michael Roper
Paul Stallan
John Gilbert
Jim Johnson
David Jamieson
Emma Wood
Lauren Li Porter
Iain Monteith
Robin Sutherland
Gillian Hanley
Matt McKenna
Karen Nugent
Gillies MacPhail
Paul Barham
Alison Glen
Rosalind Love
Peter Richardson
Helen Lucas
Karen Manson
Ian Springford
Scott Abercrombie
Ian Irvine
Matt Loader
Honor Thomson
Charlie Hussey
Mel Sutherland
Fiona McNeill
Pete Mclaughlan
Andy Campbell
Rory Flyn
Marc Williamson
Marc Kilkenny
Kevin Adams
Michael Dougal
Mark Philip
Sam Boyle
Ruth Marsh
Frances Heslop
Professor Christopher Platt
Iain Malcolmson
Suzanne Malcolmson
Laura Stephen
Neil Stephen
Oliver Chapman
Gordon Duffy

Architects and others – retired, non-members, interested and concerned:
Clare Armstrong
Christopher Gray
Will Cairns
Anthony Hemmings
David Seel
Fiona McLachlan
Sam Foster
Kerry Nicol
Rachael Scott
Graham Currie
Nicola McLachlan
Ewan Imrie
Eilidh Izat
Fiona Welch
Andy Summers
Neil Dargie
Christina Gaiger
Peter Wilson
Suzanne Ewing
Lee Ivett
Tamsin Cunningham
Lizzie Smith
Liz Simpson
Rory McCoy
Charlie Sutherland
Mairi Laverty
Neil McGuire
Suzanne Sharif
Chris Dobson
Sean Douglas
Caitlin Macleod
Chloe Yuill
Andy Gower
Lucy Miller
Gavin Murray
Raffa Esposito
Lucy Sacker
Anne Duff
Jonathan Millard


#1 Posted by ItsFridayImBoredAndDetailingSVPs on 10 Nov 2017 at 14:30 PM
St(architect) Wars Episode IX - A New Chapter Light-scale Rulers at the ready...
Charles Montgomery Burns
#2 Posted by Charles Montgomery Burns on 10 Nov 2017 at 19:49 PM
Why are some architects concerned with what RIAS staff are paid? Presumably it's because they think the £400 membership fee is too high (though arguably small change for some of the eminent names on the list).

Come on you tightwads. There's no law that says you have to be a member. Membership is either worth the money in terms of bringing work in and assisting with problems, in which case cough up and stop grumbling; or if you don't feel any benefit from the RIAS then opt out. Simples.

Just spread the cost between clients - they won't notice another couple of quid added to the already-arbitrary 'printing charges' column!
Arnold Clark
#3 Posted by Arnold Clark on 10 Nov 2017 at 22:08 PM
There is, in fact an exorbitant salary plus a big annual bonus for "someone" at the RIAS...its about 4 times the average architect's wage (plus bonus!) and that's just the sorry tip of the gravy train iceberg.

If normal members actually knew the pay structures - no one would ever pay their dues again...its our money after all. Now that i know I'm certainly not ever paying mine again - especially as its not a mandatory requirement to practice as an architect in this country.

What do you get for your annual fees? Value for money? Collective bargaining? Promotion? hell even cheaper PII?!?
No - what you get is the warm feeling that you are vastly over-rewarding someone who doesn't actually do much for members intrests.

Seems like its not just bankers or CEOs at it - but they'll use the same excuse; "we're worth it!" - if that's the case why hide the numbers?!
Fiat Multipla
#4 Posted by Fiat Multipla on 14 Nov 2017 at 09:56 AM
Never mind what Neil Baxter was paid, what is more important is tHe architectural maFia running aMok in Aberdeen. Whoever offers to tHoroughly investigate their awFul legacy of continued eMployment in the city would get my, and others, vote.
andy pandy
#5 Posted by andy pandy on 17 Nov 2017 at 14:02 PM
UR, no update on the article given the RIAS special notice today? Rebellion in the empire?

Post your comments


All comments are pre-moderated and
must obey our house rules.


Back to November 2017

Search News
Subscribe to Urban Realm Magazine
Features & Reports
For more information from the industry visit our Features & Reports section.