Newsletter - Links - Advertise - Contact Us - Privacy
 

19-storey tower to join a profusion of tall buildings off the River Clyde

June 4 2025

19-storey tower to join a profusion of tall buildings off the River Clyde

Detailed plans for a 19-storey (60m) apart-hotel tower in Glasgow have been put forward by Haus Collective and Regent Properties.

Adhering closely to a recent public consultation, the plans concern a corner site at the junction of Maxwell and Fox Street, with existing buildings to be demolished following a heritage survey by Hurd Rolland.

Hosting a mix of 169 hotel rooms and 78 serviced apartments the setback tower is the latest in a series of high-rise proposals clustered around Clyde Street close to the St Enoch Centre in the central conservation area.

Justifying the height of their proposal by identifying an increase in height from 23.6m at present to 32.2m when taking account of consented proposals, the team wrote: "Through identifying both the existing and consented context height ratios, we have established the local average height in each scenario.

"The assessment illustrates that there is indeed a significant uplift in the average height of the subject site’s Local area, primarily driven by the nature of the consented St. Enoch development, 8 Dixon Street and 222 Clyde Street."

Adopting an L-plan footprint framing an interior courtyard for the broader urban block the tower introduces vertical setbacks at upper levels along Maxwell Street as well as an entrance cutaway. The uppermost 18th floor is reserved for a rooftop restaurant, positioned to offer 360-degree panoramas of the city.

Finished in orange precast concrete cladding panels, textured at lower levels, with a contrasting with smooth white glass reinforced concrete to recessed areas.  

A cutaway entrance is intended to improve public realm
A cutaway entrance is intended to improve public realm
A listed building will be demolished to make way for the tower
A listed building will be demolished to make way for the tower

7 Comments

Dan Brown
#1 Posted by Dan Brown on 4 Jun 2025 at 16:07 PM
This is worrying because one of Glasgow's very best music venues / clubs (EXIT) is located on this site and would be demolished to make way for this scheme. It is an independent, artist-run space with a programme unlike any other venue in the city for styles of electronic and experimental music. I saw Matmos live in there just over a week ago and it was the perfect venue for them.

If this is given approval it will set a bad precedent for other developments in the city. Glasgow is a city renowned for its cultural spaces - will our planners allow developers to demolish them? I'll be objecting, and if you care about live music, I'd advise that you do too.
Roddy_
#2 Posted by Roddy_ on 4 Jun 2025 at 16:28 PM
More pre-modern fabric for demolition replaced by this bloated, mis-scaled, dreary shoe-box-on-end. A real desperate austerity architecture that is more at home in provicial England than the centre of Scotland's largest city.
Coarsely detailed, mean and with questionable adaptability. Should fly through planning.
Fat Bloke on Tour
#3 Posted by Fat Bloke on Tour on 4 Jun 2025 at 17:40 PM
Does listed building status mean anything now in Glasgow?

Well trodden path -- awkward site so cheap.
Then comes the neglect / the deterioration / the trees in the roof.
Then comes the report and the structural issues / the water ingress / the imminent internal collapse -- so lets take off the roof in case it goes on fire.

One last try to make the old building work with fascade retention surrounding an ugly monstrosity.

Then comes the final report -- the original structure has gone and it is unsafe with immediate demolition the only option on health and safety grounds.

Developer then puts forward a money making carbuncle and approval is given.

Awkward site into goldmine -- well trodden path in Glasgow. We seem to have a number of experts in our midst.

Unless you are a 30's cinema in Possilpark.
Funny that.
Georwell84
#4 Posted by Georwell84 on 4 Jun 2025 at 21:39 PM
If this is allowed to go ahead is only a matter of time when every building on that block is replaced.
James Hepburn
#5 Posted by James Hepburn on 5 Jun 2025 at 14:03 PM
Yet another study in mediocrity.
TheFakeArchitect
#6 Posted by TheFakeArchitect on 5 Jun 2025 at 14:19 PM
What a shocker! There's absolutely no finesse about that building and detailing already looks very heavy and clunky. If the images cant even attempt to make it look mildly interesting, goodness knows what the end product will look like.
Casual observation
#7 Posted by Casual observation on 5 Jun 2025 at 19:02 PM
What is it with Scotland and tall buildings? It's well past the point we need to build up rather than around. This country needs actual skyscrapers.

Post your comments

 

All comments are pre-moderated and
must obey our house rules.

 

Back to June 2025

Search News
Subscribe to Urban Realm Magazine
Features & Reports
For more information from the industry visit our Features & Reports section.