Newsletter - Links - Advertise - Contact Us - Privacy
 

Fraser criticises 'low rise' Caltongate plans

Bookmark and Share | Send to friend

April 2 2013

Fraser criticises 'low rise' Caltongate plans
Writing in today’s Scotsman Malcolm Fraser has cautiously welcomed revised plans by Artisan for the retention of the Canongate School as part of its Caltongate masterplan – but criticised the low rise and low density nature of the proposals which are at odds with the historic compactness of the Old Town.

Below runs Fraser’s piece in full:

 
I'm immensely cheered that the new Caltongate proposals - for the Edinburgh Old Town site that has been such a damaging community/heritage/development battle - retains the old, stone, Victorian Canongate School that had been slated for demolition. There is a viable "Word Bank" proposal for its use as a community arts and social enterprise hub and I hope that Artisan, the new developers, go on to work with its promoters, the Old Town Development Trust.

I'm pleased because I've lobbied for its retention. Indeed our refusal to contemplate its demolition, when we were in competition with Allan Murray Architects for the masterplanning of the whole site, must have contributed to us not being chosen for the work. The new proposals have been welcomed as representing a triumph for "compromise" - and, yes, the retention of this decent old stone building is the positive side of compromise, as in doing the right thing.

But then the new Caltongate has also been welcomed for being the "low rise" that suits its location, and for the "wide open vistas" it retains - such criticism being directed at our proposals for the last developers, on the Jeffrey Street portion of the site, that have been reduced, in these new ones, to a wee glass blob.

Low rise! And wide open vistas! In the Old Town?! I am writing this in my North Bridge eyrie, a historic, 11 storey high-rise less than 200 metres from the Jeffrey Street site. Our proposal there was for 6 storeys to mark this important historic gateway to the Old Town and, in addition to it being half the height of my office, the tenement which once stood here, as shown in the 1819 print, was taller, at 7.

The print looks up along the City Wall, from around the front door of the new Council headquarters towards the Netherbow Port and the Royal Mile junction with the modern St Mary and Jeffrey Streets. This narrow view and route out from the Old Town was the first connection north from the dense, contained High Street and was a hugely significant route, the Royal "Via Regia" as well as the more prosaic Leith Wynd.

The Victorians demolished all this; and while, at Cockburn and Victoria Streets, they very beautifully restitched their Old Town "Improvements" back into the surviving medieval fabric, they failed at Jeffrey Street, leaving a dull, undifferentiated roofline (as opposed to the vigorous, raggedy one of the rest of the Old Town), some weak gables and a lonely wee car park.

Our Leith Wynd proposals - above and behind the arches - recovered all that vigour, reintroducing the Wynd in a broad, lively stair down, providing vigorous uses at all levels and into the arches, containing the view (narrowed from that left by Victorian demolition but much wider and more connected than the medieval one), forming a high-level public square with dramatic views over the New Town and out to sea, and recovering the vigorous roofline in the old view.

It's a great shame that the heritage and community lobbies have fought so hard - and with apparent success - to retain the low rises and wide open vistas of Victorian demolition, and against the recovered medieval density and public bustle of our proposal. So, there's compromise as doing the right thing, and compromise as timidity. Do we think, for a moment, that it was timidity that has built this great, dramatic Edinburgh?
Fraser's own Leith Wynd proposals entailed retention of a series of Victorian arches
Fraser's own Leith Wynd proposals entailed retention of a series of Victorian arches
This 1819 illustartion of Leith Wynd by James Skene, reproduced courtesy of City of Edinburgh Libraries, illustrates the lofty ambition Edinburgh's architects once had
This 1819 illustartion of Leith Wynd by James Skene, reproduced courtesy of City of Edinburgh Libraries, illustrates the lofty ambition Edinburgh's architects once had

2 Comments

bonvivant
#1 Posted by bonvivant on 5 Apr 2013 at 10:31 AM
Setting aside the historic and picturesque arguments for Fraser's vision for the development, the main reason it should be more densely developed is its location adjacent to the major public transport hub of Waverley station.
CADMonkey
#2 Posted by CADMonkey on 5 Apr 2013 at 15:37 PM
Just because a site is in The Old Town doesn’t necessarily mean it ought to be intensively developed.
Every site has site forces and this one in particular has established and cherished attributes, these being the fabulous views to Calton Hill, providing relief from the intensively developed medieval closes of The Old Town.
Low rise is appropriate here.
Where is "Leith Wynd" anyway? I thought this particular site is sandwiched between Cranston Street and Jeffrey Street.

That all said, this is simply at PAN stage and if the process results in a high rise proposal comes forward I hope it is more contextual.
A main stumbling point with the previous proposal is that I don’t think people were convinced about the style of the proposed architecture.

Post your comments

 

All comments are pre-moderated and
must obey our house rules.

 

Back to April 2013

Search News
Subscribe to Urban Realm Magazine
Features & Reports
For more information from the industry visit our Features & Reports section.